Transcripts (perhaps draft) of the Article 50 ‘Brexit’ Appeal hearings at the Supreme Court

The argument the other way would be if on this hypothesis, which I think is the case, we accept that the 1972 Act imposed some sort of clamp, then your argument could be turned against you by saying that if Parliament had wished to remove the clamp in the 2015 Act, they could have said so and they didn't.

Keyboard shortcuts

j previous speech k next speech