Transcripts (perhaps draft) of the Article 50 ‘Brexit’ Appeal hearings at the Supreme Court

I think what is being put to you, which you may say is a non-question, is if, when we look at the Act, we come to the conclusion that Parliament has not decided to exclude the royal prerogative or has decided to let it continue or apply, we cannot decide which, or Parliament has not gone either way, then what? Or do you say we have to interpret the Act one way or the other?

Keyboard shortcuts

j previous speech k next speech