Transcripts (perhaps draft) of the Article 50 ‘Brexit’ Appeal hearings at the Supreme Court

But they leave the prerogative in place, is the argument. The point I am really on here is, what happens if you are against me on 72? How does that work? What is the significance then of 2015? The analysis then goes, we submit, if it is all about exercise, then 2015 is not as it were reinventing something which has died -- exhuming the body, as someone I think put it -- it is simply, and again wary of my Lord, Lord Kerr's metaphors point, it is simply indicating that hereafter the exercise of the royal prerogative is entirely proper.

My Lords, the motion. May I just briefly tell you --

Keyboard shortcuts

j previous speech k next speech